Datacenter Topics (CMUG February 25, 2014)

Author
Peter Welcher
Architect, Operations Technical Advisor

I presented a Cisco Mid-Atlantic Users Group session on “Datacenter Topics” today. It covered NSX, DFA, ACI, among other things. I even said “SDN” a couple of times. And thanks to the 80 or so people that braved snow (flurries) to attend! And those who drove 2-3 hours!

20140226-fig01The intent of the presentation was to present a variety of recent technologies, with an eye towards what the design and strategic implications are, and how things may change in the future. The topics included: FabricPath, OTV, 1000v and Virtual Appliances, VXLAN (VXLAN networks and tunnels), VMware NSX, DFA (Dynamic Fabric Automation), ACI (Application Centric Infrastructure), Automation and SDN, and some summary thoughts. I tried to present all this as some ideas, perhaps some provocative ideas, with a lot of audience interaction. (Thanks!) To make the discussion actionable, we talked about the positioning of the products, and likely pros and cons.

The presentation can be found here.

Here are some after-thoughts that come to mind… maybe they’ll make this short blog a bit more provocative… polite comments welcomed.

For those looking for SDN, it’s not there in the CMUG presentation (at least, not much). I downplayed SDN, focusing more on concrete products (or soon-to-be products). There’s a lot of exciting potential in the SDN efforts, and in the open source efforts underway. However, many (most?) sites are looking for vendor-supported solutions. They’re not early adapters. Such organizations can’t afford the human or dollar costs, nor risks, around software integration, coding, etc. to leverage the new technologies. So I think it useful to focus more on what one can do today, while keeping an eye on what one might want to pilot or monitor as SDN and automation tools evolve. A practical, pragmatic approach?

I see this situation as being like network management. It’s only worth so much money or effort in most organizations. Network management software gets installed, discovery gets done, and the tool works to some degree. Good tools work, mostly. Bad or mediocre tools are painful to use and eventually stop getting maintained or used. Being more productive is useful, to a point. In most shops, network management products don’t seem to get all that much use for actually managing the network. We’ve managed to turn that around in a couple of places.

Such sites can’t afford to spend say $2M or even $200,000 on a whiz bang network management tool that really makes them more productive, no matter how good it is. Nor can they spend another wad of money for experts to come in and tweak the software so it works better. Especially as some of the costly products aren’t all that great anyway (i.e. there is risk!).

Such organizations are not equipped to undertake programming or systems integration, that’s just not the business they’re in. In the future, maybe they’ll buy a packaged solution, or do without. Such a solution might come from a company that has built packaged solutions that are deliverable at an affordable cost. I expect those vendors, and some large organizations, will be those who hire those networking people that learned to program and work with open source SDN tools and/or Puppet, Chef, CfgEngine, etc. (I’m thinking @colinmcnamara, NexusIS here — and others.)  What do you think — will most networking people learn how to program in Python or some other language? And use tools like Puppet, Chef, etc. without a GUI front end?

Think I’m wrong? Gary Kinghorn of Cisco says something similar just now in Is ACI Really SDN? One Point of View to Clarify the Conversation. “What’s caused the biggest evolution in SDN is the realization that very few organizations really have the desire, skills and incentives to write a new class of applications to a published API to program the network.”  Hey, I now feel trendy, for getting to that point before the pundits! (For those who think I’m occasionally negative, it’s my anti-hype filter. It sometimes triggers on strong enthusiasm too.)

Recent Related Blogs

Twitter: @pjwelcher

Hashtags: #DFA #ACI #NSX #SDN #datacenter #FabricPath #OTV #VXLAN

Disclosure Statement

ccie_15years_med CiscoChampion200PX

Leave a Reply

 

Nick Kelly

Cybersecurity Engineer, Cisco

Nick has over 20 years of experience in Security Operations and Security Sales. He is an avid student of cybersecurity and regularly engages with the Infosec community at events like BSides, RVASec, Derbycon and more. The son of an FBI forensics director, Nick holds a B.S. in Criminal Justice and is one of Cisco’s Fire Jumper Elite members. When he’s not working, he writes cyberpunk and punches aliens on his Playstation.

 

Virgilio “BONG” dela Cruz Jr.

CCDP, CCNA V, CCNP, Cisco IPS Express Security for AM/EE
Field Solutions Architect, Tech Data

Virgilio “Bong” has sixteen years of professional experience in IT industry from academe, technical and customer support, pre-sales, post sales, project management, training and enablement. He has worked in Cisco Technical Assistance Center (TAC) as a member of the WAN and LAN Switching team. Bong now works for Tech Data as the Field Solutions Architect with a focus on Cisco Security and holds a few Cisco certifications including Fire Jumper Elite.

 

John Cavanaugh

CCIE #1066, CCDE #20070002, CCAr
Chief Technology Officer, Practice Lead Security Services, NetCraftsmen

John is our CTO and the practice lead for a talented team of consultants focused on designing and delivering scalable and secure infrastructure solutions to customers across multiple industry verticals and technologies. Previously he has held several positions including Executive Director/Chief Architect for Global Network Services at JPMorgan Chase. In that capacity, he led a team managing network architecture and services.  Prior to his role at JPMorgan Chase, John was a Distinguished Engineer at Cisco working across a number of verticals including Higher Education, Finance, Retail, Government, and Health Care.

He is an expert in working with groups to identify business needs, and align technology strategies to enable business strategies, building in agility and scalability to allow for future changes. John is experienced in the architecture and design of highly available, secure, network infrastructure and data centers, and has worked on projects worldwide. He has worked in both the business and regulatory environments for the design and deployment of complex IT infrastructures.